The Answer to a Long-Asked Question

For a long time I am vaguely thinking about the reasons for the obvious gap between what I perceive as justified complaints from American men about the corrupting effect of feminism and women's "sexual liberation", about the disastrous consequences it has for their lifes and society in general, and what I see here, at my end. "Hypergamy" is a concept I always understood only theoretically and which I did not consider part of my culture. Now, at the most interesting Australian blog The Social Pathologist, which I found by chance, as one does, in the Internet, and specifically at the entries The Virgin Bride and The Programmable Sex (including the comments) I found at last an explanation that makes actually sense (plus an interesting sideline about the nature of Islam).

The Social Pathologist, who is a doctor, has a matter-of-fact attitude towards the female nature, backs up his points with a lot of data and is lacking the sneering, cynical and contemptuous attitude of Roissy and his ilk, something I find unsavoury and hard to tolerate.

Here is where I come in:

The_Editrix said...

"Some [pissant artist] burns a koran and it's art, some [non-Christian preacher where Christians are a minority] puts a crucifix in urine and that's a hate crime."

Point taken and yes, there are two sides of that matter -- theoretically. However, the fact remains that no embassies burn and no people die if somebody puts a crucifix in urine. Maybe it's a conservative thing to understand that "equality" isn't the answer to everything.

"The whole divorce end point is complicated by a whole host of variables."

SO true!

IQ (at least occupational status correlated to IQ) does decrease divorce rate........... in America. In other countries it increases it."

I'd wager that is, because American society is in many things lower middle class (or petty bourgeois, if you like that better) in its VALUES. ("What WILL people say!") From my experience -- I am a German who was partly socialised in England -- people above a certain stratum simply don't care what others say about them.

Fascinating discussion. Keep up the good work!

8:09 PM

The Social Pathologist said...

The Editrix, thanks for dropping by.

However, the fact remains that no embassies burn and no people die if somebody puts a crucifix in urine.

That's because Christians don't care. If they did the embassy's would burn. The only reason why the towelheads burn embassies if because they love Allah, we give God lip service.

I'd wager that is, because American society is in many things lower middle class (or petty bourgeois, if you like that better) in its VALUES.

It is both American society's strength and weakness. America probably cannot scale the heights of European glory, nor can plumb the depths of European wickedness.

people above a certain stratum simply don't care what others say about them.

So true, but it's a fatal flaw to have when the criticism leveled against one is legitimate. Sometimes its most beneficial to care about public opinion, most times its not.

11:52 PM

The_Editrix said...

"It is both American society's strength and weakness."

Indeed! I was trying not to be judgemental, just stating a fact. A lot of American traits we tend to sneer at are really strengths.

I find this blog most interesting because it seems to deal with the facts of female nature, different from the Roissy-ites, in a matter-of-fact and non-contemptuous way. Many of the complaints of American men, of which I have no doubt that they are justified, I find as exotic as I might find the the mating rites of some Australo-Papuan tribe.

To make an attempt at putting the problem, as I see it for the European society in which I live, into words: Women are not able to live their sexuality in a self-reliant and responsible way. They simply don't possess the ethical and moral fibre necessary for that and need the confinements of a TRADITIONAL marriage. The most destructive single cause for the decline of our civilisation is the sexual liberation of women. I see a woman at the root of virtual each and every marital and familial failure I am watching. I see sluttiness, idleness, vanity, lack of backbone, morals and common decency. What I do NOT see is "hypergamy". But then, when I first came across the American wedding cult, five-figure wedding dress, diamond ring, the lot, more than ten years ago in the Internet, it was one of those Australo-Papuan culture shocks as well. I am not saying that we are any better in Europe or Germany, we aren't, and the outcome for marriages and families is just as disastrous here. All I am saying is that the underlying motives are different, and that wouldn't be so if "hypergamy" were really a biological given.

I see this as food for thought and further discussion, not as the ultimate truth.

However, and on a different note: I'd like to strongly contradict your statement about Muslims. I don't think Muslims love their Allah, which is not the God of the Bible, as we love the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. They just hate everything and everybody that doesn't fit into their debased world view. I strongly deny that we can learn anything from them. Any similarity with a traditional Christian view, be it the love of God, women's modesty or whatever, is purely pheno- not genotypical.

Off my soapbox now. ;-)

1:49 AM

The_Editrix said...

It seems I ought to have read your entry "The Programmable Sex" first. It goes a long way towards explaining the differences. If one assumes that women's sexuality does indeed reflect societal norms and peer group pressure, it is not so amazing anymore that American woman go for material gain and a diamond ring when looking out for a mate, and German women for (far more frightening) idealistic reasons. Don't take that as a flattering description. Germans are at their most obnoxious, even dangerous, when their sense for idealism is tickled. If I think of the failed marriages within my circle of friends and acquaintances, I'd wager that the adulteresses are very sure that they really "love" that man, "deserve" him and can make him SO much happier than his wife can, in brief, that they are doing actually a good and meritorious, even noble, thing. Few of those I have in mind right now have gained much financially, but, again, that doesn't make them in the least better than any American gold digger and the marriage and family they broke up is just as broken.

The same applies to the wives who leave their husbands because they are bored. They usually don't improve their financial status.

Reversely, you would be amazed for what German men are exchanging attractive, charming and even rich wives. The Roissy-ites with their scale of female attractiveness would be stunned. I am not a man, so I can only say that I haven't a clue what makes them tick. Admiration from the cook or groom they don't get from their wives? Maybe, but why MARRY them?

I have been thinking for a while now rather sketchily in that direction because the differences are so obvious to me when I have no reason to doubt the complaints of the American men. Thank you and this blog for helping me clarifying that.

4:13 AM

It seems, that every society has got its own aphrodisiac and that women always make the worst of it.

When Oestrogen Meets Mohammed

The blog Islam in Europe reports via Al-Arabia:

Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi gave a lesson on Islam and copies of the Quran to a few hundred young Italian women Sunday as he arrived in Rome for his fourth visit in a year.

It was the second time the Libyan leader - who travels with female bodyguards and fancies himself a self-styled feminist - had staged such an event for Italian women, who were recruited by a modeling agency and paid an undisclosed sum to attend.

Michela, who asked that her last name not be used, told Associated Press Television News that three of the participants converted to Islam on the spot.

"It was a really beautiful meeting and went very well," she said. "He is very easygoing and he gave us a copy of the Quran. Three girls converted themselves to Islam during the ceremony. It was a beautiful event."

Other participants, though, identifying themselves as Roman Catholics in this overwhelmingly Catholic country, said Gaddafi had urged others to convert and had dismissed Christianity as unimportant.

Unfortunately, it is not really amazing that such "modern" woman, shallow, self-centered, silly and sexually and morally corrupt as they are, will fall for the "charm" of that disgusting old pervert. Nothing shows the danger of women let loose on the prowl better than the fact that they are the main enablers of the death cult that goes by the name Islam.

The Ehical Superiority of the Female Sex

While doing the modest research for the previous entry I found this:

It's a one-page website and the above is the sole content. It can be found at the URL:
http://www.howtogetyourexboyfriendbacktips.com. And no, I'll not go there, I or my computer might catch something nasty.

At my German blog I recently discussed an article in the leading German "teen mag" (Gosh, the word alone is nausea-inducing) Bravo (which targets at a readership between 12 and 17), where the young were informed how to deal with their "exes", another just as pukeworthy piece of vocabulary. Notabene that the strategies, all heavily relying on in-depth knowledge of the dirtiest of human sexuality, suggested for girls to apply to their ex-boyfriends are notably more fiendish and swinish than those suggested for the boys to treat their ex-girlfriends with. I wonder why. Not.

(Notabene that they were not castigated for THAT by the a certain faction of the blogosphere, but because they only focused on -- ta-daaa -- heterosexual sex. (I am considering to rename this blog, because I have come to think that not feminism, but the homosexual lobby may be the "most destructive single cause for the decline of our civilisation".)

In case you wonder whether there is a page http://www.howtogetyourexgirlfriendbacktips.com -- there isn't, I tried it. I wonder why. Not.

Praise to the Conduct-or

And if the young man had bitch-slapped her in return, as he ought to have done, all hell would have broken loose. Something like this will happen if women are setting the standards for behaviour. Men are emasculated because their best instincts are vilified and incriminated. Notabene that this didn't happen in America, but in a Catholic, European country. It's creeping in everywhere.

Hat tip: So much wrong.

If there is no man at hand...

... a suppressed Muslim woman will do the job just as well:

This hasn't anything to do with Islam, really:

A Calgary mother won’t spend a day in jail for killing her teenage daughter with a head scarf — a decision that has prompted outrage.

A national victims’ group, based in Toronto, is stunned by the suspended sentence given to Aset Magomadova by Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Sal LoVecchio on Thursday.

“I really strongly disagree. It sends a massively huge message to the rest of the country and the world that her daughter’s life was valueless,” said Joe Wamback, co-founder and chairman of the Canadian Crime Victims Foundation. Dear Mr. Wamback, no doubt you are meaning well, but you are talking about a Muslim family. To her, her daughter's life WAS valueless. You have ... HOW many Muslims in Canada? (It doesn't really matter how many exactly. If something like that happens, there are too many already.) Get an education!

“Even though this girl may have been a handful and trouble, that’s not the issue. Good to know! We are relieved, otherwise we'd thought that killing her is just the appropriate measure to discipline an unruly teenager. The issue is human life. Oh yes? Sentencing is not just about the criminal, but has to speak for the victim and to denunciation.” Gosh, how frightfully non-politically correct. No wonder nobody gave a damn.

In October, LoVecchio acquitted Magomadova, 40, of second-degree murder and found her guilty of manslaughter in the death of Aminat, 14. He placed her on probation for three years with several conditions, including taking counselling for grief, depression and anger management. And a trip to the Caribbean and an unlimited supply of McDonalds coupons for life.

The judge rejected an argument by Crown prosecutors Mac Vomberg and Sarah Bhola for a 12-year prison term, instead accepting the position of defence lawyer Alain Hepner, saying a suspended sentence can still meet the demands of sharia justice.

“At first blush (a suspended sentence) may sound like a get-out-of-jail-free card. It is not,” said LoVecchio. What else is it then?

“The court has said the act in question does not merit a period of incarceration. What the court has done is reserved or, to use the word of the statute, suspended judgment on that point for a period of time on conditions. If the conditions are satisfied, then the individual will not be sentenced. If they are breached, the individual will be brought back to the court to be dealt with further.” This is so debauched, so debased and rotten to the core, that it can only come from a judge in a liberal Western country.

Magomadova was charged after the deadly incident at their home the morning of Feb. 26, 2007, after Aminat refused to go to court to be sentenced for assaulting a female teacher at her school.

The devout Muslim mother claimed Aminat came at her with a knife in her sewing room, where she prayed several times a day. She said she reacted by wrapping the scarf around her daughter’s neck and twice told the girl to put the knife down before the teen lost consciousness.

A knife was found in the room, but the daughter’s fingerprints were not on it. But Muslims don't lie. Didn't you know that their faith forbids lying? It's peace, too. Oh yes, and mercy!

LoVecchio, who rejected a defence of self-defence, deemed the woman did not intend to kill the teen, even though medical examiner Dr. Sam Andrews testified that death as a result of such an act would have taken at least 2 1/2 minutes.

Jennifer Koshan, an associate professor at the University of Calgary’s faculty of law who researches family violence, said the vast majority of fatal family violence cases involve husbands killing their wives. I guess this totally useless and a-topical information is supposed let the murder of the girl somehow appear less gruesome. At least it wasn't a man who choked her.

“It’s relatively unusual to see a mother killing a child, especially an older child,” [sic!] said Koshan. “So it’s rare for the court to be faced with this situation. Maybe that influenced the judge in his decision.” Right! So the court said: "We have never dealt with a mother strangling her teenage daughter cruelly to death over a time of 2 1/2 minutes, so let's not deal with it at all!" What a magically wise solution.

Marilyn Millions, one of Magomadova’s sponsors with St. James Anglican Church, said outside court she was relieved “at the compassion and mercy that has been shown” by the court. Sorry, I'm not commenting on that. Words fail me.

“There were lots of tears and emotion,” she said. “If you’ve lived through it and you’ve gotten to know these people, it’s all in the context. It’s a lot different than reading a little bit about it. It’s a very different situation.” WHAT is a very different situation? Having to deal with a murderous Muslim walrus?

Millions also said it was the wish of the family that “people would know mental-health services for young people and help for their families will be improved, and changes made to the system, so that others who have to go through similar situations do not fall through the cracks.” So that woman killed her daughter because she fell though some "cracks"? It wasn't really her fault?

Hepner said his client was crying after she learned she’d be free to go home and agreed it was an appropriate sentence. You bet!

“The judge considered all the factors and it was a very lengthy decision,” said Hepner, who had sought either a conditional jail sentence to be served in the community or the suspended sentence. “He considered the background, psychological and psychiatric background. What else can a judge do in arriving at a proper decision?” Maybe use some common sense and simple human decency?

LoVecchio said he wrestled with the dynamics of the family in reaching his conclusions. The "dynamics" of that family are that of a Muslim family in the West.

He noted that the woman came to Canada for a better life for herself and her children from Chechnya, where her husband had been killed by Russian invaders and she had part of her foot blown off. And that excuses killing her child, no doubt. I don't want to appear unkind, but I'm afraid the Russians blew the wrong body part off.

“This was a family in crisis with events spiralling out of control,” he said, alluding to the friction between Aset and Aminat leading up to the deadly confrontation that morning. Well, whatever.

“It cannot be reduced to simply a case of mom choosing to kill her daughter as a form of discipline because she misbehaved. Quite simply, the events of that morning cannot be seen as a single isolated event.” Blah blah blah yabber yabber yack yack ...

And nobody even remembered that all this was supposed to be, too, about speaking for the victim and denunciation.

And, you know, that is not really about Islam, that's how Islam is EXPLOITED by people like that infanticidal hippopotamus.

But whatever. I, for one, will think twice in the future if Islam critics (myself included) are waxing lyrically about the victims of Islam who long so much to be free, weren't it for that evil, testosterone-laden culture. Not that it is all THAT new, mind you. A Google search Muslim mother kills daughter returns the following hits on page one:

Gary Robinson's Rants: Mother kills raped daughter to restore 'honor'
Mother kills raped daughter to restore 'honor'. I could hardly believe this story: Raped by her brothers and impregnated, Rofayda Qaoud refused to commit ...

Daughter raped by brothers, murdered by mother
18 Nov 2003 ... 'Thousands of women have been killed in the name of honor' ... Related stories: Muslim slays daughter in 'honor killing' ...

CANADA: MUSLIM mother attempts to 'honor kill' her own daughter ...
14 Jun 2010 ... A Montreal Muslim mother from Afghanistan is facing charges that she tried to kill her teenaged daughter, in what police suspect could be an ...

UK: Muslim mother hires hit man to kill Westernized daughter ...
4 Sep 2009 ... UK: Muslim mother hires hit man to kill Westernized daughter. After my adventures yesterday in Florida, it seems as if the only people who ...

The Google bot, befuddled, asked me at the bottom of the page: Did you mean to search for: Muslim father kills daughter

No, Google. I most definitely do NOT mean to search for that. Methinks that even a search engine can become a victim of the "It’s a very different situation” phenomenon.

P.S. Do you have any idea, Americans, what triggers off one of my recurrent "I-dislike-America"-bouts (it is applicable to the entire North American continent, by the way)? If your media calls somebody like that "a [insert location] mother". "Mom" is worse.

Had tip: Beak!

Where are the feminists? Where is the outrage?

Found here at the eyeblast.tv blog.

It may be 2 years old but I think it’s emblematic of the situation. Watch the video again and let it sink in how chilling this is. A crazed anti-semite comes out saying that Muslim men should sexually harass and even rape Israeli women and what does this arab tv network do? They invite her on and interview her as though she were just another political commentator with a provocative position.

And the sad thing is that in a society where the call for mass genocide against the Israelis is a common event this woman’s disgusting insanity really is just provocative. In a region of the world where denials of the holocaust and calls for its renewal are common place perhaps the treatment of the call for the mass rape of Israelis as legitimate by a tv network isn’t surprising.

But, clearly, it is disgustingly reprehensible and yet another reminder of exactly what the Israelis are up against.

Notabene that this woman wears no headscarf, that she has had obviously a Western education and that the anchor wears a Western suit and tie. These are the textbook moderate Muslims the West yearns so much to embrace.

If this is two years old, where have the feminists been in the meantime? Where is the outrage? What else do we need to prove the utter worthlessness and hypocrisy of feminism?

---

Hat tip: The 'gator!
Cross-posted at Roncesvalles.

I still hope this is a hoax!

This is so outgrossing that it defies belief. The report below is from the British rag "Sun". At least they are non-politically correct enough to call the sort of encounter described a "bizarre relationship". It's not quite as good as "swinish self-indulgence", but we can be grateful for small mercies. In the American media they'd probably call it "heartwarming" and "romance":

A 72-YEAR-OLD granny* is having an incestuous affair* with her own GRANDSON — and the pair are set to have a BABY*, according to reports.

Grey-haired Pearl Carter has allegedly began a bizarre relationship with her 26-year-old grandchild Phil Bailey.

Pearl, from Indiana, is now using her pension to pay $54,000 (£35,000) to a surrogate mother so they can have a child, say reports in New Idea magazine in New Zealand. That's wonderful! I wonder what has been her profession.

Pearl said: "I'm not interested in anyone else's opinion. Well, that's obvious. I am in love with Phil and he's in love with me. Soon I'll be holding my son or daughter in my arms* and Phil will be the proud dad*."

[...]

Phil is the son of Pearl's daughter Lynette Bailey — who the pensioner* put up for adoption when she was just 18, the magazine reported.

When Lynette died, Phil tracked down his long lost gran* — 46 years his senior — and they started their strange relationship*.

Pearl told New Idea: "From the first moment that I saw him, I knew we would never have a grandmother-grandson relationship. Gack! For the first time in years I felt sexually alive." And, of course, that's what matters.

The pair spent their first week together shopping, bowling and eating out. SO classy! And she remained continent for an entire week. Fancy that!

Pearl said: "I called Phil into my bedroom, sat him on the bed, and then I leant over and kissed him. Of course, the old bag started it.

"I expected rejection but instead he kissed me back." Maybe he has a penchant for "making love" to oversized leather bags.

Phil told the magazine he had the same feelings towards Pearl. What a poor, lost soul!

He revealed: "I wanted to kiss her there and then. My feelings were overwhelming. Vomit!

"I love Pearl with all my heart. I've always been a pervert and attracted to saggy old leather bags older women and I think Pearl is gorgeous*. Yuck! Now I'm going to be a dad* and I can't wait.

"Yes, we get laughed at and bullied when we go out and kiss in public Which proves that at least some people have not yet lost all their standards! but we don't care. Obviously not. You can't help who you fall for.*" That is what every sex offender says.

The pair have asked 30-year-old Roxanne Campbell to carry their child*.

Pearl said: "I am finally going to be a mum* and not forced to give up my child. How cute! Phil's going to be a great dad*. I never in a million years thought at 72 I'd be 'pregnant' and in love with* my grandson. Puke!

"I make no apologies and I believe God's given me a second chance." Please God, give me the strength NOT to comment on this. Please God!

Pearl says the relationship is not wrong after a friend told her about Genetic Sexual Attraction (GSA) syndrome This sort of science will excuse anything, from sodomy to mass murder!, which occurs when close relatives meet as adults and find they are attracted to each other*.

She said: "I could now understand my feelings and realise they weren't wrong." Yeah, right!

Pearl was 18 when she fell pregnant with daughter Lynette. She was living with her Catholic parents Hey, was the pope's fault! And did he ever apologise for it? in Indiana and they insisted she give the baby away. They probably knew why.

They organised a private adoption and Pearl never saw her baby girl* again.

[blah yabber yack]

*Lower middleclass cute-ism alarm

SHOULD this been true, and I still hope it isn't, it ought to remove the last doubt that a society that lets women run loose is bound to perish. What I find encouraging, though, is the vast majority of scathing remarks in the comment sections, interspersed with a few "blah consenting adults Yabber Yack" ones.

A Few Words with American Men

At Lawrence Auster's VFR the case of a 35 year old nurse is discussed. She got "romantically" (this is probably my most-loathed Americanism among countless much-loathed Americanisms) involved with an Iranian asylum seeker seven years her junior. She tried to break it off with him after he failed to pay the instalments for the refund of the 3,000 GBP (no less) he stole from her bank account. For that, he stabbed her to death 130 times in the face and neck.

Again: Here we have a mature, educated and (judging from the one picture at VFR) very attractive woman who embarks on a relationship with an unsavoury grease ball 7 years her junior. She had been unfazed by the abysmal record of relationships between European women and Middle-Eastern (read: Muslim) men. She considered it a serious relationship. She obviously granted him access to her bank account. She even didn't break off with him after she caught him stealing, only after he failed to pay for the refund. One of the commenters at VFR says:

"I just don't get what is in the minds of these women? Is it really just overwhelming liberal/ ideological tendencies that draw them to men whom they should know will do nothing for them then bring probable heartache or even death itself?"

We traditionalists need to come up with convincing answers to these questions because there are legions of young, single men in America thinking the same thing and the Gamers are ready and standing by to give them what they want. The Gamers will say it is inherent to woman's nature to seek danger and excitement and male dominance rooted in biological evolution, so learn to be dangerous, exciting, and alpha, or else you are doomed to a miserable, single existence. At the very least, this is a coherent, rational sounding explanation to the average guy, and it has some truth to it, notwithstanding the broader materialist/nihilist worldview to which it appeals. With the Gamers confidently announcing exegesis on these types of phenomena we can't be left scratching our heads.

The Gamers never made much sense to me. They are trying to explain away the fact that American men voluntarily gave up their rights and their duty in the name of political correctness and are now whining about being discarded as "beta males". Worse, to justify it, they are searching for "a coherent, rational sounding explanation", while committing a serious fallacy. How can it be biologically "inherent to woman's nature to seek danger and excitement" in male dominance when human life had been at all times about raising children in safety -- freedom from physical threats and starvation, which is about the opposite of the female yearning alleged by the Gamers? Do unemployed Muslim grease balls fit into such a pattern of providing for the mutual offspring in every aspect? Good joke!

Yes, traditionalists need to come up with convincing answers to these questions indeed. What about a little bit of ... traditionalism? Forty years of "emancipation", forty years of being able to make "choices" have proven that women are, by and large, unable to make sane, reasonable choices. They need the strict guidelines of a traditionally organised society under male rule.

What went wrong? Social stigmata have been removed from our consciousness as unjust. Obviously, justice and fairness is a concept alien to the female mind. While the original idea was, for example, to de-stigmatise a poor little wench who had been seduced by one ruthless male predator and born an illegitimate child, womanhood in general took it as an invitation to have as many illegitimate children as they liked. While the original idea was to de-stigmatise divorced women -- How could one to be expected to know what suffering laid behind anything like that! -- they took it as an invitation to discard their marriage vows as irrelevant. While the original idea was, for example, to do away with something as evil as social, religious or racial boundaries, womanhood in general took it as an invitation to embark on a "relationship" with any bum who happened to catch their undiscerning fancy. I could quote more examples. You get the general idea?

Women need to be married young within their peer group, getting a divorce ought to be considerably impeded; and parents ought to get their guts back to tell their children: "THAT IS NO COMPANY FOR YOU!"

I, as a German, see quite a few typically American traits which have very probably aggravated the status quo and while I am trying not to be judgemental, this ought to be addressed. For once, I don't think the degree of materialism at our end is quite that high. That is not a good or bad thing per se, materialism is a healthy notion and can be, without doubt, constructive, and idealism extremely destructive. In fact, German idealism has led us disastrously astray, historically. However, recognising such cultural differences may be helpful and it just is a fact that good looks of a woman don't seem to be considered here all that much as a marketable item. I see friends and the daughters of friends who have, for better or worse, chosen men far below any reasonable expectations they objectively had. The only one who married a seriously rich man did it for love (and paid a high price for it), but by and large those marriages worked out as well as one can possibly expect in a society without rules. Then there is the American body cult. And while I admire the polish of American women (I have profited from it by buying as-good-as-new designer clothes at Ebay) it has a flipside as well. If some breast implants on two legs with remarkable credentials of American dentistry in what might once have been a pretty girl's face and an artfully dishevelled blond mane on top are considered a paragon of American beauty, something stinks. Not to speak of the organised sexual child abuse that goes by the euphemism of "child beauty pageants" and which for some reason makes me mad beyond anything else.

Does anybody seriously think that FATHERS want their little girls to strut their stuff like that? And can it in any way be considered ethical, or even useful, to base a woman's market value on that and JUST that?

Dear American men, get a grip on reality. If you want to save your home and the West, you don't need to be blown to smithereens by an Islamist bomb in some remote country. Go home and tell your wives as a first step that you expect a decent dinner, a clean house and a smiling face if you come home after a day of work providing for her and your children's livelihood. Tell your daughters that they are not (NOT!) to dress like sluts, that "sexy" is a no- and "popular" a rather doubtful standard. Tell your children that you expect them to keep up some degree of societal quality, that people are only very theoretically all the same and that Salsa classes are not the right place to meet somebody for a lasting commitment. And then go and give some spine back to your sons who have been in the meantime emasculated by generations of feminists (not all of them female) kindergarten workers, teachers, psychologists, therapists and other assorted scum of the earth. Just as a couple of first steps.

I, personally, think it's too late, but I couldn't keep my big mouth shut.

To Russia Without Love Redux

The case of the 7-year-old little Russian boy who was sent back as unwanted is, in a sad way, very interesting and eye-opening.

Artur Lukyanov (I prefer this version of phonetic transcription), the man who was hired to pick him up at the airport has a blog, which is worth reading. If his English is really self-taught (as the saying goes), it's remarkable. In an interview with CNN, Lukyanov tells how he had stumbled once before across a Russian-American adoption disastrously gone wrong.

Several years ago, he said he was hired by an American couple by the last name of Pavlis.

"They just wanted to see some sites," Lookyanov recalled. "They also asked me to drive them to a hospital to pass an adoption examination for their boy."

Lookyanov said he spent two days working with Irma and Dino Pavlis. He said he took them and their adopted Russian son Alex to McDonald's and ate with them.

"Two months after I saw them in Moscow... I learned that by accident this boy died," Lookyanov said.

A month after the adoption, six-year old Alex was dead due to blunt force trauma to the head, news reports at the time said. There was evidence that his adoptive mother had punched him in the stomach.

A court sentenced Irma Pavlis to 12 years in prison for manslaughter. She reportedly served five.

Lookyanov's brushes with failed adoptions have left him reeling, physically shaking as he discussed the cases.

There are additional details in the Internet:

Less than two months after his arrival, Alex Pavlis' promising life ended tragically. The 6-year-old was beaten to death by his adopted mother [sic!].

Irma Pavlis, 34, of Schaumburg, Ill., was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the December 2003 death. During her trial, she said she loved the boy but that he was mentally unstable and suicidal. Although she recently was sentenced to 12 years in prison, the repercussions of the case continue, both in the United States and in Russia.

Yeah, no doubt she "loved" the boy. I guess that's an "Illinois mom" to the American media, to whom no detail is ever too cheesy or too cynical.

But back to the case of little Artyom, which is full of fishy details, which may be, or may be not, attributable to lousy journalism. For one, is it so easy to get a 7-year-old Unaccompanied Minor on an international 10-hour-flight? His Russian passport, on which he allegedly travelled, was in a sealed envelope in his backpack. He couldn't speak Russian. Did he forget all of it during the seven odd months in America? He couldn't write, which implies that he wasn't numerate either. How could he then attack his "aunt" when she asked him to correct his maths? Did they teach him just maths and not how to write? So the adoptive "mother" sought advice from psychologists but never arranged for the boy to meet one? The adoption agency contacted the woman in March when everything seemed to be fine with the child. She then even expressed wishes to adopt a second child. The ten-year old boy Logan is sometimes refered to as Hansen's child, then again as her sister's child.

I guess for some time to come I'll will be quite sick at the sound of words and idioms like "I don't want to judge", "love", "mother", "mom", "I can empathize with", "wants to have a family/child", "my heart goes out", "our thoughts and prayers", "tragic", "heartbreaking" and some more.

Tough luck he isn't a puppy!

By now, everybody will have heard of the 7-year-old adopted boy who was placed on a flight back to Moscow by this "Tennessee mom". (Don't get me started now on disgusting American euphemisms!)

The boy may well have been a violent nutcase and she can blame the adoption agency and the Russian officials for dishonesty as much as she wants. They probably were. I am not even insisting that it was her duty to undergo therapy and all the excruciating processes other, responsible, adoptive parents choose to undergo. (Well, it WAS her duty, but I am not insisting on it for argument's sake.) However, nothing changes the fact that she put a helpless, troubled little boy alone on a 10-hour- flight and arranged for a stranger she found via the Internet, and who could have very well have been a fiend , to pick him up at the other end to drop him off like an broken bit of merchandise. So the child was too much fuss for her. Alright, but ist seems that even getting rid of him in a halfway decent manner was too much fuss for her.

I did quite an extensive Internet search and I found countless sheer and undiluted expressions of disgust at the "adoptive mother's" behaviour, even more expressing stern disapproval but granted her "good intentions" in the first place and that they could relate to her because they experienced similar problems with their own adopted child and -- worst -- those "I don't think we can judge unless we have gone through the same blah blah blah ..." relativists. Right! I guess you can't judge a mass murderer or a paederast until you've killed a few and raped at least one child. Gosh, DO I hate "ordinary people".

Neighbours in the rural town of 20,000 said Hansen [the adoptive mother] was a loving mother who found she could not cope with a violent child.

Linda Austin said: 'We knew there were problems but she tried her best. I think she is getting the raw end of the deal.'

Another neighbour added: 'Torry desperately wanted a child of her own, but she just found this boy uncontrollable.'

I wonder what they'd said had the skank abandoned a puppy. We've yet to see a snappy slogan like "A child is for life, not just Christmas".

However, what I did NOT see in the course of my Internet search, was one single challenge of the fact that here we have a case of a "single mom" (Did I say that you oughtn't to get me started on disgusting American euphemisms?) as an "adoptive parent". Incidentally, previous adoption failures have increased Russian officials' wariness of adoptions to the U.S. In 2006, Peggy Sue Hilt of Manassas, Virginia, was sentenced to 25 years in prison after being convicted of fatally beating a 2-year-old girl adopted from Siberia and 2008, Kimberly Emelyantsev of Tooele, Utah, was sentenced to 15 years after pleading guilty to killing a Russian infant in her care.

Does anybody see a pattern there?

Or here?

A Florida woman left her adopted Guatemalan kindergartener in the airport immediately after bringing him to the United States (he remained in foster care until she sought, and regained, custody of him 16 months later).

I guess we can at least be grateful that they didn't call her a "Florida mom".

What can one expect from a woman with a crappy name like "Torry Ann"? (I sometimes think that every single cliché is true.) What from an "adoptive grandmother" who makes "cute" statements like the one saying that her daughter "only wanted to have a family". And nobody laughs that old bag out of the door and tells her, as her daughter isn't married, that, no, she can't.

Is there really a scenario all that easily imaginable, where a married couple would do that to a child? That they would have rejected professional help? That they would have come forward with simpering bullshit like they "only wanted to have a family"? As if that would explain, let alone excuse, anything.

Women simply don't have the moral fibre, strength, reliability, integrity, maturity and devotion to be trusted with the sole care for a child. It's bad enough what they are doing to their birth children, so it's sheer and utter madness to indulge their whim "to have a family" and let them adopt. If they are unable to form a stable relationship with a man, how can they be trusted to form one with a child?

America, you have a lot of problems. You have a radical leftwinger in the White House, massive economic issues and God knows what consequences your immigration policy will have. But the worst you are doing to yourself is feminism. Why? Because it goes straight at the heart of any intact society -- the family.

What happened to the little boy is bad enough, but what is worse is the fact that nobody seems to notice that adoption rights for unmarried mothers stink.

Surprised, Anybody?

The pastoral head of the umbrella organisation of Germany's Protestant churches has admitted drunk-driving after having passed a red light and being caught with a blood alcohol level three times over the legal limit. This is not the first time the church leader has made headlines. Criticising Catholic teachings on homosexuality, the ordination of women and celibacy come to mind. The calling for the withdrawal of German troops from Afghanistan in a sermon on New Year's Day became well known or, if you like, notorious, as well. The representative of Germany's 25 million Protestants, who revels in the role of a moral authority, who has in that capacity criticised bankers for their greed during the financial crisis and condemned all forms of "excess", vocally declared that "Nothing is good in Afghanistan" and urged a speedy withdrawal of the German troops.

Now I will let you in on a secret about German psychology. You can bet your last penny that, if a German opposes a war -- ANY war -- he is really, deep down, opposing WWII, where the evil Americans attacked a trusting and innocent Germany to prevent it from completing their great patriotic deed.

"There is no such thing as a 'just war.' I cannot legitimize it from a Christian point of view," the bishop had stated, and: "There is nothing right in Afghanistan. All these strategies have just obscured the fact that soldiers are using their guns and even killing civilians."

Asked whether that applies to the war against Nazi Germany as well, the reply was affirmative: "They always say, if the Allies hadn’t attacked there wouldn’t have been freedom. But I say — why wasn’t there a strategy to avoid war? Why wasn’t the German opposition to Hitler strengthened? Why weren’t the rails leading to Auschwitz bombed?" And who gives an aviating fornication for the fact that is was the "strategy to avoid war" in the first place that enabled Hitler to turn into a threat to the entire free world.

Predictably, such history-relativising and responsibility-misaligning statements evoked a groundswell of support from the leftist German mainstream, public and media.

And now for the really interesting detail: The bishop is, interest- but not really amazingly, a bishoppette.

That women, known for granting the disgusting German tabloid BILD (no links to BILD from my blogs) interviews about her love life and her theology, never misses a snide remark about the Catholic church, like, for example "I'm not an infallibe papette", which proves either that she doesn't deserve her doctorate in theology or that she is an intellectually dishonest hack and oughtn't to head a Protestant kindergarden, let alone the Protestant church. Papal infallibility is clearly defined, strictly limited and has been executed twice, namely by Pope Pius IX in 1854 regarding the Immaculate Conception and by Pope Pius XII in 1950, defining the Assumption of Mary. But that theologian can safely assume that BILD readers don't know that anyway and whatever if it only makes such a great point against that evil old man in Rome whose throne even SHE (SHE SHE!) won't be -- horribile dictu -- able to reach. All this, mind you, goes by the label of "improving ecumenism".

We have, incidentally, reported on Margot Kässmann already when she was shameless enough to equate the radicalism, religious zeal and potential danger of Muslim and Christian converts and about the big slime spot she left in the Scripture when she twisted it to justify the breach of her marital vows. This bishopette, notabene, is divorced.

But as usual, not the problem is the problem, but how people react to it. The entire leftist public and media have their Attends in a knot to protect this paragon of leftist, i.e. rotten-to-the-core and depraved, values. Her organisation explicitly "covers her back" and the online fora are atwitter with statements saying that this is basically a good thing because it proves that she is, after all, human. And that when we all thought, just like she did herself, that she is godlike. Just imagine for a fraction of a moment what had happened, had a Catholic bishop made the same "honest mistake".

I, personally, find it almost a relief that her statements can now safely be dismissed not just as the the unbalanced rantings of an unhinged woman drugged by the thought of her own importance, but as the unbalanced rantings of an unhinged alcoholic woman drugged by the thought of her own importance. With a blood alcohol level of 1.54 o/oo, a non-alcoholic would have been, at best, able to find the next lavatory in time, but not his car, let alone open it, start it and drive it. That is not bad in itself, she is neither the first nor the last alcoholic in such an office, what IS bad is that she thought that she could get away with it (and that, so it seems, she WILL get away with it) and didn't even bother to call a taxi. Being high on one's own inflated ego and being high on alcohol is, in the end, difficult to tell apart, or so I guess.

If Margot Kässmann was, so far, the first bishopette of the German Protestant church, she is now the first booze-bishopette of the same church. And the latter is only the to-be-expected consequence of the former.

Cross-posted at Roncesvalles.

A Match Made in Heaven Useless Exercise

The internationally known, controversial historian and media personality Niall Ferguson has broken up with his wife of 16 years after a string of adulterous affairs. The 45-year-old Harvard professor has left former newspaper editor Susan Douglas, who had enabled his breakthrough in the media and with whom he has three children from the age of nine to fourteen, for the Somalian-born Islam-critic Ayaan Hirsi Ali, so the Mail informs us earlier this month. And:

The pair are understood to have met at Time magazine’s prestigious 100 Most Influential People In The World party in New York last May. Ferguson and Ms Hirsi Ali, who have both been on the list, were introduced by Belinda Luscombe, the magazine’s art editor.

[...]

Ms Luscombe, a friend of Ms Hirsi Ali, said: ‘I think that is where they met for the first time. In all the years I have known Ayaan, she’s never had a boyfriend. She’s gorgeous, but with a fatwa, it’s tricky to find guys.’

Cry me a river. But there's always another woman's husband or so it seems.

Hirsi Ali, who wants to ban conservative and Christian political parties, which includes immigration restriction parties, in Europe and equates the Catholic faith with Islam, Nazism and Communism, is an outspoken feminist, and yet she's dropping her knickers for a British Conservative and he's quite happy with the idea while the depraved, rotten to the core media stands by and applauds because it's so romantic. Isn't it amazing the way love (for lack of a better word) crosses racial, religious, and political boundaries. But only when it wants to.

Interestingly, in the inroduction of Ferguson's Virtual History (the counter-factualism on which it is based is highly controversial among historians), he explicitly equates Fascism, Communism, and Feminism. But what does it matter for a notorious philanderer if it comes with a new piece of pussy.

Many historians dismiss counterfactual history as sometimes entertaining, but not meeting the standards of serious historical research due to its speculative nature and dismiss it as "a useless exercise". Rather like Ms. Hirsi Ali's criticism of Islam or her "conservative think tank" work, or so it seems.

When Feminists are Lying

Excuse the bad pun, but I couldn't resist!

Professor Chesler talks once again about her genitals the Islamic threat to the West:

Earlier today, I was lying on my gynecologist’s table in a highly exposed position when . . .

And that’s where I stopped reading.

I mean, surely, that’s only what one can expect from a feminist with her “gynaecocentric” world view, but she ought to stop pretending to be writing about politics.

I am sick now.

The Mutual Goal of Feminism and Islam

Commenter Jake Neuman sent me a link to his website with a summary of his book Islam: Evil in the Name of God. I haven't read it (yet), but judging from the summary and the brief preview at Amazon, I find it sufficiently important to give it some publicity.

Why do I publish this at an anti-feminist blog, you may ask. Well, the topic of the Evil of Islam and specifically the hanging of women and - yes - little girls in Iran is a recurrent theme of my writing and the fact that the treatment of women in the Third World -- and specifically in Muslim countries -- is a none-issue for feminism is the strongest proof that feminism doesn't care in the least for women's welfare, but is well-matched with Islam in their mutual goal to destroy our Western society, values and freedom.

So here is Islam: Evil in the Name of God:

THE BANALITY OF EVIL: THE BANALITY OF SILENCE
IT'S ALL ABOUT ISLAM STUPID KAFIR

Read Why: 9/11 is Koran Teaching 9:111. The murder of
2,973 human beings on 9/11 is not a crime
in Islam but a holy,divine act guaranteeing accession
to a Paradise filled with lustrous eyed, full breasted
virgins. Kafirs (nonMuslims) are vile sub-humans to
Muslims possessing absolutely no humanity. The killing
of 2,973 meant no more to Muslims then stepping on
2,973 ants.

Read why in Islam, God is a pedophile monster and a
male chauvinist pig. Sex with children, raping sex
slaves, enslaving women and children are divine, holy,
eternal laws of God.

Read why: The prophet Muhammad was no prophet of
God but a psychotic manic.

Read why: Islam is a total renunciation of God - a very
great crime and sin against God.

Read why: In the struggle against Islam nothing less then
the existence of Western Civilization is at stake.

President Roosevelt said in his 1932 inaugural address
“Only Thing We Have To Fear Is Fear Itself”.

Well - IT’S TIME TO FEAR FEAR

BOOK SYNOPSIS

THE FIRST NEDAS

MURDERED BY ISLAM



Mona Mahmudnizhad...........................Taraneh Mousavi

The picture of the Iranian woman hanging from a construction
boom on the front cover is dedicated to the two thousand women
hanged in Iran since the revolution. They are all the first Nedas.

It is dedicated to the 10 Bahá' religious women hanged
in Shiraz Iran in 1983 after they refused to renounce
their religion and become Muslims - Mona Mahmudnizhad,
who was just 17 years old, 23 year old Roya Ishraqi, a
promising veterinary student, was executed with her 50 year
old mother, Izzad Janami Ishraqi, 20 year old Akhtar Sabit,
a graduate nurse, 28 year old Mahshid Nirumand a physics
graduate from the University of Shiraz, Shirin Dalvand 25
years old, Tahirih Siyavushi a 32 year old nurse, 20 year
old Simin Sabiri, Zarrin Muqimi and the oldest 54 year old
Mrs Nosrat Yalda'I.

Another Neda was Dina Parnabi an Iranian high school student,
accused of smuggling forbidden literature and criticising the
regime in her talks with her classmates. She was hanged on the
10th of July 1984 in a Teheran prison. The hanging was done in
private andafter the execution was over, her body was stripped,
washed and delivered for dissection at medical school.

16 year old Atefeh Rajabi was hanged in public in the town of
NekaAtefeh. Atefeh was executed for “engaging in acts
incompatible with chastity.” At the place of execution in the
town’s square, the judge personally put the rope around the
girl’s neck and gave the signal to the crane operator to begin
her hanging. Witnesses reported that she begged for mercy
and had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the execution
truck. Judge Haji Rezaie said he was pleased to hang her and
is quoted as saying, "Society has to be kept safe from acts
against public morality." Her body was left dangling from the
crane for some time so people could see what happened to
teenagers who committed acts incompatible with chastity.

187 of these first Neda’s were under the age of 18, with 9
girls under the age of 13. The youngest girl executed was
just 10 years old. Thirty two of these women were reported to
have been pregnant at the time of their execution. Many of
those executed were high school and college students. Hanging
is the most common method of execution for women, although
some are shot. Men and women were hanged in large groups
in Tehran prisons from cranes and forklift trucks. Each crane
jib or forklift had a wooden or steel beam to which the noose
was attached and when the preparations were complete, the
prisoners were simply hoisted into the air.

Under Revolutionary law, young girls who were sentenced to
death could not be executed if they were still virgins.

Thus, they were "married off" to Revolutionary Guards and
prison officials in temporary marriages and then raped before
their execution, to prevent them going to heaven. The Mullahs
believed that these women were ungodly and did not deserve
paradise in the next life and that if they were deprived of their
virginity, it would ensure that they went to hell. Therefore, on
the night prior to execution, the condemned girl was injected
witha tranquilliser and then raped by her guard(s). After the
execution,the religious judge at the prison would write out a
marriage certificate and send it to the victim's family along with
a box of sweets.

The back cover is of 3 gays murdered by Iranian justice
according to the holy teachings of Islam.


This book exposes the evil of Islam and very grave
danger Islamic ideology poses to all freedom
loving peoples everywhere.

The issues raised by the recent revivalism of Islam are of
life and death to the democratic world. Islam is one of the
most serious threats freedom loving people have ever faced.
It is the greatest threat that western women have faced to their
hard won freedoms and legal protection of their basic rights.
Islam is one of the most diabolical ideologies ever created. You
must understand what Islam truly represents and participate
in the fight against this very evil ideology.

Ignorance is not an option.

Islam demands the surrender or conquest of all kafir
nations and extermination of their nonMuslim population.
This is the cold-hard reality for the hear-no-evil, see-no-evil,
do-nothing-about-evil naive kafirs. Iran’s present will be our
future if we do not stand against this evil. Only by declaring
that God is a God of Moral Perfection can this Islamization
disaster be prevented.


A GOD OF MORAL PERFECTION
VERSUS
ALLAH (the ANTIGOD) OF THE MUSLIMS

By
The Last Prophet Of God
An Unknown Kafir But Not Yet A Dhimmi of Islam

This is an historical book totally devoid of any political
correctness. The Western World is engaged in a life and
death struggle with Islam. Tonight, mankind faces
extinction as a species not only from global warming
but also from Islam. The Last Prophet of God has
destroyed Islam with just one word.

What you must fully understand in order to protect your
family and country against this very great evil living and
flourishing among us is that the Koran defines the kafir
as a subhuman who can be murdered, raped, robbed,
terrorized, or tortured. For Allah, these are holy, divine
acts deserving of Paradise filled with lustrous eyed, full
breasted virgins who regenerate as virgins after each sex
act with Muslim men sporting external erections. All
these Koranic teachings of extermination, murder, rape,
slavery, looting, terror, sex with little girls, the non
humanity of kafirs, sexual Paradise for Muslim killers
etc are FOREVER. THEY ARE ISLAM.

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE KORAN STUPID
KAFIR

Kafirs are vile sub - human beings. They have zero
humanity.

It is the prime directive of Islam to conquer the nations of
the world for Allah (the AntiGod) by whatever means
necessary. Allah (the AntiGod) seeks the extermination
of all kafirs. By refusing to convert to Islam, kafirs
have declared war against Islam, are a grave danger
to Allah and must be destroyed. A most important
concept that must be emphasized repeatedly is that
Islam is a declaration of war against kafirs. What
you must understand is that Islam is not anti Jewish
– it is anti kafir. The Jews are the most viled of
kafirs followed by Christians, Hindus, etc. The Koran
is not a holy book but a book of war. A book of
genocide. Allah is the AntiGod of war. Again, this
war is permanent until all kafirs either convert to Islam
or agree to pay a devastating jizya (submission tax)
and accept dhimmude status (see chapters 43 and 44)
or be murdered.

For Muslims, it is a holy religious duty to murder kafirs.
The Koran is written in the language of terrorism.
It is filled with numerous verses urging the Muslims to
terrorize the non Muslims, kill them, and take possession
of their lands and properties. The important points to
remember are that whatever Muhammad did to terrorize
the kafirs was actually the actions of God. Among the
many verses which exhort Islamist terrorism, the
following verses stand out as naked aggression of
Allah/Muhammad on the unbelievers: 2:63, 3:151, 8:12,
8:60, 8:59, 9:5, 9:29, 9:55, 11:102, and 17:59 etc. These
teachings are the eternal laws of Allah (the AntiGod)
authorization of murder and extermination as a holy duty.

ISLAM IS ISLAM

Islam is not a wonderful religion of peace and love that
has been hi - jacked and perverted by a few bad apples
of evil Islamo - Fascists, Islamic militants, Islamic
Fundamentalists, jihadists, Wahhabism, radical Islam,
political Islam, Islamists etc. There has been no hijacking.
There has been no perversion. These demented souls are
following exactly the teachings Allah and the Koran and
in the divine footsteps of the Prophet – Muhammad as
described in the Hadiths.

MUHAMMAD WAS ALLAH

THE ALLAH (OF THE KORAN) NEVER EXISTED
EXCEPT IN THE MIND OF MUHAMMAD

Allah (of the Koran) was the fictional creation of
Muhammad who slaughtered, murdered, tortured,
terrorized, raped and enslaved kafirs. At the Massacre
of Banu Quraiza, Muhammad personally assisted in the
beheading of 600 to 900 Jewish men and in order to
distinguish young Jewish boys from young Jewish men
ordered their pants pulled down and groin area inspected
for pubic hairs by his SS known as – the Companions.
Those boys with the slightest growth of hair were dragged
away and beheaded. MUHAMMAD WAS THE FIRST
ADOLF HITLER

THE COLD HARD REALITY FOR THE HEAR NO EVIL,
SEE NO EVIL, DO NOTHING ABOUT EVIL KAFIRS

Allah is not God but the AntiGod of the Muslims.

The Koran is not a holy book but Mein Kampf.

Islam is totally bogus, a sham and a fraud

ONLY A GOD OF MORAL PERFECTION IS GOD

The Last Prophet has brought mankind a stark message directly
from God – proclaim the Declaration of A God of Moral Perfection
and Muslims abandon Islam or go to extinction as a species.
By embracing this message that only a God of Moral Perfection
is God can mankind save itself from extinction. The proclamation
of this Declaration will be an historical event that will change the
future of mankind. Indeed it will guarantee that there will be a
future for mankind.

In this book the Last Prophet demonstrates;

Why the slaughter of 2,973 on 9/11 meant no more to Muslims then
stepping on 2,973 ants?

Why a Muslim can never be President of the United States ever?

Why all black males will be castrated commencing the extermination
of the black race if Islam conquers the World?

Read The Treaty of Washington: Surrender of United States to Islam.
In God We Trust Will Be In Allah We Trust.

Why teaching children Islam is child abuse?

The Islamic Republic of The United States of America and Islamic
Republic of Europe. The nightmare of an Islamic takeover by Muslims
of the United States and Europe is described in vivid detail.

How Sharia Law will replace the US constitution becoming the
rule of law governing every aspect of every American’s life.

How stealth censorship is destroying freedom of speech.

Why only by declaring that God is a God of Moral Perfection can we
prevent this Islamization disaster of the West?

A revolutionary revolution in the conception of God.

If God exists then God is great. It is the so-called “men of God”
who are not great.

Why Islam is a total renunciation of God and worships Allah (AntiGod)
of the Muslims?

Why in Islam, all nonMuslims (kafirs) are vile subhumans with
absolutely no humanity? Muslims can murder kafirs, rape and enslave
their wives and daughters, loot their property. These are not crimes
but holy, divine, blessed acts guaranteeing accession to a Paradise filled
with big breasted, lustrous eyed virgins who regenerate as virgins after
each sex act with these Muslim killers sporting eternal erections.

Honor thy father or be murdered. Why honor killing is honorable
in Islam?

Why Barack Obama will not expose the evil of Islam, but instead
will make it mainstream and grant this evil ideology respectability?

Why Colin Powell is the ultimate dhimmi’sdhimmi?

Why Western Civilization is the greatest civilization in history?

Why rape jihad is being waged against kafir women across Europe?

Why the boys from Mumbai will soon be followed by the boys
from New York and the boys from London?

And much more.

CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1: A God of Moral Perfection

If God Exists Then God Is Great. It Is the
So-called Men of God Who Are Not Great

A Revolutionary Revolution in the Conception of God: Declaration of
Universal Religious Rights and Freedoms of A God of Moral Perfection

CHAPTER 2: It’s All About Islam, Stupid Kafir

Your Democratic Obligation as a Kafir

Organization of Islam

The Truth of Islam

Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb: The House of Islam and The House of War

Sharia Law

CHAPTER 3: God of Moral Perfection versus Allah (the AntiGod)
of the Muslims

Requirements Necessary for the Koran to be the
Eternal Divine Word of God

Why the Koran Is Not the Word/Teachings of a God of Moral Perfection.

Broad Overview of the Immoral Koran

CHAPTER 4: Examination of the Immoral Teachings of the Koran

Verse 9:5 The Infamous Verse of the Sword

Verse 9:29 People of the Book

Verse 4:89 Of Apostasy

Verse 5:33 Of Barbaric Cruelty

Verse 8:12 Of Beheading

Verse 47:4 Instructions of War

Evil Demented Depraved Islamic Paradise as Laws of God

Verse 9:111 Muslims Passport to Paradise

Sex In Islam and Islamic Paradise

CHAPTER 5: Allah’s Teachings Celebrating the Massacre of the Jews
At BanuQurayza

BanuQuraiza; Brief Description of the Massacre in Islam’s Own Writings

Muhammad Besieges BanuQuraiza for 25 Days. After the Jews
Unconditionally Surrender All Men Are Beheaded, Women and Young
Girls Raped and Sold Into Slavery. Their Property Is Looted.

Merciful Muhammad Orders Trenches To Be Dug for the Beheaded Heads
to Fall Into and Control the Blood Flow

Big Problem: How Did the SS Jihadist Executioners Decide on Which
Jewish Boys to Slaughter or Leave Alive to be Sold into Slavery

Aisha Describes the Only Woman Murdered At BanuQurayzah:
She Was Delirious Because Her Husband Had Just Been Beheaded.
She Was Taken by the SS Jihadist and Beheaded, Putting Her Out of
Her Joyful Misery

Muhammad Took One of the Jewish Women as His Sex Slave.

The Looted Property and the Jewish Women and Children Were Divided
Among the Muslims

Allah Allows Muhammad and His Jihadists to Have Sex with Their
Sex Slaves

Muhammad Shows No Mercy

Muhammad Enriches Himself

Allah Shares In the Looting and Pillaging of Murdered Jews Property

Why Does Muhammad Not Show Mercy?

Allah (the AntiGod) Celebratesthe Massacre at BanuQurayza

Enjoy the Booty

CHAPTER 6: God’s Incitement to War

Jihad: Holy War: War In the Name of and to the
Greater Glory of God

164 Jihad: Unholy War Verses in the Koran

CHAPTER 7: Rape: A Holy Act Ordained by God as a Weapon of
War

Following are some of the immoral evil laws of Allah (the AntiGod) of
raping sex slaves. These laws are eternal and for all time.
Men can marry up to four women if they treat them equally;
unlimited forcible concubines permitted

Muhammad can go beyond the four-wife restriction, can treat his own
wives and sex slaves unequally.
This verse is for Muhammad. God allows Muhammad to own and
rape his slave girls.

CHAPTER 8: The Massacre at Khaybar

Muhammad Attacks the Rich Jewish Settlement of Khaybar Without
Warning. Muhammad Takes SafiyaAs His Sex Slave After Murdering
Her Father, Brothers, and Torturing and Murdering Her Husband
Distribution of War Booty InKhaybar.

Muhammad Has Safiya’s Husband Horribly Tortured to Try And
Force Him to Reveal Where He Hid the Gold Treasure of the People
ofKhaybar. He WasBeheaded After He Refused to Give Up the Treasure.

The Looted Property and Women and Children Were Distributed
among the Jihadists

Enjoying Special Booty (Gani-maater-maal): Muhammad Takes Safiya
as Booty to Be His Sex Slave.

Muhammad Attacks and Rapes Seventeen-Year-Old Safiya:
Muhammad Was Sixty.

CHAPTER 9: The Massacre at BanuMustaliq

Muhammad Attacks The Jewish Settlement of BaniMustaliq:
He Captures and Rapes a Twenty-Year-Old Jewish Girl, Juwairiya.

CHAPTER 10: Sex Slaves: Muhammad and Those His Right Hand
Possess

CHAPTER 11: Women Are Equal of Men: God Is Not A Sexist;
God Is Not a Male Chauvinist Pig

In Islam’s Own Writings: Allah and His Messenger’s
Extreme Hatred of Women

Muslim Women are Dirty Polluting Creatures

Women are inferior, slave to men

Muslim women are sex object for men's enjoyment

Muslim Men can Capture Infidel Women as Sex-slave Booty

A Woman’s Testimony is Worth Only Half of a Man’s
Brutal Punishment for Women
Fewer seats for women in Allah's Paradise
The Tyranny of Men over Women

Polygamy

Wife Swapping

Wives as slaves

Wife Beating

Muslim Women: Islam’s Domestic Animals

CHAPTER 12: Sexual Perversions of Prophet Muhammad
Necrophilia With His Dead Aunt
Sucking The Tongue of His Daughter and Cousin’s Sons

Muhammad Transvestite Tendencies

Breast Feeding Grown Men by Muslim Women and The Billy Goat

From Islam’s Unholy Book

CHAPTER 13: Allah Is a Pedophile Monster
Baby Tilths

CHAPTER 14: Muhammad: A Human Being of Perfection

Muhammad: The Perfect Husband and Family Man
Baby Aisha and Muhammad: A Love Story For The Ages Between
a 6-Year-Old Child and a 53-Year-Old Sexual Pervert. It will bring
Tears of Joy to Your Eyes and Heart: From The Holy Book Of Islam

Muhammad and Molestation of Baby Aisha (From the Writings of Islam)

Muhammad Would Sexually Abuse His Wives

The Prophet Would Do All His Wives In One Night

This Sickness of Islam and Raping Baby Girls Is An Evil Approved
By Allah(the AntiGod) for All Time

Why Koran 65:4 Is Not The Word/Teaching of God and Therefore the Entire

Koran Is Not the Words/Teachings Of God

CHAPTER 15: Cruelty, Torture

In Islam’s Own Writings: Muhammad, the Most Merciful Prophet
Torture: Hands must be cut off for theft

Muhammad Ordered Feet and Hands Cut Off and Eyes Burnt Out, and
Left To Suffer a Horrendous Death

Beat the children if they do not pray

Burnt alive for missing prayers

Homosexuals are to be killed

Apostates must be murdered

Alcoholics beaten

Stoning in Islam: Diabolical brutality

CHAPTER 16: Allah Is A Barbaric Barbarian

Why Koran 24:20 Is Not The Word/Teaching Of God And Therefore
The Entire Koran Is Not The Word/Teachings Of God And Therefore
Islam Is Fraudulent

CHAPTER 17: Owning Slaves is an Eternal Law of God

CHAPTER 18: The Koran Is a Book Filled with Hate

Hitler: The Final Solution of the Jewish Question and Muhammad:
The First, “Final Solution” of the Jewish Question of Saudi Arabia

Mein Kampf versus the Koran
Hitler and the Final Solution of the Jewish Question

Hitler’s Hatred of the Jews

Muhammad and the First, “Final Solution” of the Jewish Question
of Arabia

Muhammad’s Teachings of Pure Hate From the Hadiths. Kill All
The Jews: The First, “Final Solution”

Muhammad’s Teachings of Hate from the Koran

The Quran Celebrated the Massacre of the Jews of BanuQurayza

Anti-Jewish Hate Teachings in the Koran

Following, from the Koran Are Teachings Not of Pure Love But of
Pure Hate. Verses that show intolerance of and incite violence
against non - Muslims and other religions.

CHAPTER 19: Islam Devours It’s Young

CHAPTER 20: Honor Thy Father Or Be Murdered

What is honor killing?
Honor killing is different from other killings

Some sample cases of horrific honor killing

Honor killing is an ETERNAL Law of Allah (the AntiGod) in Islam
Dictums Of Koran and Hadiths Which Dictate/Incite Honor Killing

CHAPTER 21: Teaching Islam to Children Is Child Abuse
(Recapitulation of Kornic Teachings Quoted In This Book:
Why Teaching Them Is Child Abuse)

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Owning Slaves Is
An Eternal Law Of God?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Raping Slaves Is
An Eternal Law Of God ?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That As Muslims
They Can Loot and Pillage the Property OfKafirs?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Teaches Children
That Kafirs Must Convert to Islam or Pay A Jizya (Submission)
Tax or Be Murdered As Eternal Laws Of God?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That All Other Religions
Must Submit To Islam?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology With An Evil Demented
Depraved Sexual Islamic Paradise?

How Can Any Western School System Allow the Teaching of
An Ideology Created By An Evil Incarnate Child Abuser, Wife
Abuser, Rapist and Murderer – Muhammad?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Preaches the
Oppression and Submission of Women to Men?

How Can Any School Proclaim An Ideology That Teaches
Brutality as An Eternal Laws of God?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Teaches Rape with
Young Female Muslim Children?

How Can Any School Teach An Ideology That Teaches Children
Hate and Intolerance Toward Jews, Christians and All Other Kafirs?

Any School System That Allows Teaching Islam Is Guilty of Child
Abuse and Charges Should Be Brought

CHAPTER 22: Islam Is To Be Superior Over All

Quoting From The Koran

CHAPTER 23: Obeying The Messenger Is Obeying Allah

The Criminality of Muhammad
27 bogus, fraudulent teachings of obeying Allah and his messenger

CHAPTER 24: Very Important Statistics Concerning Koran

Love versus Fear in the Koran: A Statistical Analysis

Muhammad Versus Allah: Statistical Analysis

Jihad: Statistical Analysis

Women In Islam: Statistical Analysis

CHAPTER 25: Absurd Teaching of the Koran – Verses That Allowed
Muhammad to Cancel the Adoption of His Adopted Son and
Marry His Adopted Son’s Wife

CHAPTER 26: Teachings Regarding Muhammad’s Wives
As Eternal Laws Of God: A Soap Opera

CHAPTER 27: Muhammad: A Human Being of Perfection

Muhammad’s Dead Poets Society
The assassinations of satirical poets in early Islam
The Evidence

1. March 624: Al-Nadr bin al-Harith
2. March 624: Uqba bin Abu Muayt
3. March 624: AsmabintMarwan
4. April 624: Abu Afak
5. September 624: Kab bin al-Ashraf
6. September (?) 624: IbnSunayna
7. July-August 625: A One-eyed Bedouin
8. After January 630: close call for Abdullah bin Sad
9. After January 630: One of Abdullah bin Katal’s two singing-girls
10. After February 630: close call for Kab bin Zuhayr
Defense and Challenges

Dark Inspiration from the Quran

Supplementary material

CHAPTER 28: Murdering Musicians, Singers In Islam

CHAPTER 29: The Ten Commandments Are Not the
Teaching of a God of Moral Perfection

CHAPTER 30: Jesus versus Muhammad

Islam Is A Very Great Sin And Blasphemy Against God and Jesus

Jesus the Revolutionary

Jesus Was a True Prophet of Peace and Love

Muhammad Was a True Prophet of Murder,Torture, Terror, Massacres

A Complete Rejection of Jesus

Muhammad and Jesus

He Really Despised the Jesus/Mary/God Trinity Relationship
and the Christian Worship of Them As Polytheism

CHAPTER 31: Western Civilization: The Greatest
Civilization in World History

CHAPTER 32: What Islam Isn’t

CHAPTER 33: Is It a Rational – Is It a Reasonable Human Thought

CHAPTER 34: Reform of Islam:

What Turkey Must Do Before Being Allowed to Join The EU:
The 36th Chapter

God’s incitement of war

CHAPTER 35: Europe’s Final, “Final Solution” of the Jewish and
Christian Question: Finishing the Mission of Muhammad and Hitler
Let’s Give A Red Card to the City of Cologne, Germany

How Stealth Censorship is Destroying Freedom of Speech

CHAPTER 36: The Boys from Mumbai: The Muslim Killers
of the Mumbai Massacre: Soon To Be Followed By the Boys
from New York City and the Boys from London

CHAPTER 37: Muhammad, the Prophet of Peace

CHAPTER 38: Islam, the Religion of Peace

Bloody Expansion of Islam: History of Jihad

CHAPTER 39: Blacks Calling Themselves Muslims
Should Be Ashamed

CHAPTER 40 Barack Hussein Obama: America’s First Muslim
President

CHAPTER 41: Why a Muslim Can Never Be President of
The United States, Ever

CHAPTER 42: Banality of Evil: Banality of Silence

CHAPTER 43: America and Europe’s Future: Dhimmihood

CHAPTER 44: Articles of Surrender: The Treaty of Washington

CHAPTER 45:Sharia Law Will Be the Rule Of Law

CHAPTER 46: Only A God of Moral Perfection Is God

NOTES

SUPPLEMENTARY: Partial Listing of The 1000 Evil Teachings
That Must Be renounced, Denounced and Removed From Koran

THE END



Cross-posted under a different header at Roncesvalles and IBA.